National Debt

I finally got myself out of debt not too long ago so I have some appreciation for how it can build up pretty quickly and weigh you down. After seeing the chart posted here: http://www.lafn.org/gvdc/Natl_Debt_Chart.html on a friend’s facebook wall I thought may be I should adjust the numbers for inflation to give a more apples-to-apples comparison.

I used the calculator at inflationdata.com and took the dates as being from October of the year of the debt to October of 2010.
So here is the inflation adjusted chart:

I thought may be it was a little disingenuous to blame all of the debt woes on the President and so I also color-coded it by ruling Congressional party (where mixed means the Senate and House had different ruling parties). I found the majority parties at about.com:

But then I thought that Congress and the President work together to come up with a budget to meet the needs of Government so I thought of the President and Congress as equally powered and created yet another color coding where if at least one half of Congress and the President are of the same party the year is colored by that party. If all of Congress is ruled by a party and the President is of a different party I colored that as “mixed”:

Now the real question is, who’s really in charge of this? I think of it as a shared responsibility, but I always see it blamed on the President. Perhaps it’s because the President drafts the initial budget? Perhaps it’s easier to point the finger at a single person? What do you think?

The saddest part of all this is that NEVER is the National Debt increase a negative number. In the last 35 years we’ve never paid off more debt than we’ve taken on. I guess that’s one way to keep us from being attacked by China. I think the consequences if other countries stopped lending to us would have much more of an impact then if they went to war with us.

And finally if you want to see how I crunched the numbers you can do so in my “National Debt” excel file (it’s in xlsx format).

The Sun Also Rises book review circa 2000

The following is a review of the “Sun Also Rises” which I wrote in English class junior year of high school. It was created after reading approximately a quarter of the book before I gave up on it:

“The Sun Also Rises” is a very well written book that does things technically well. But, technically good doesn’t mean good. Hemmingway is very good at writing, but not at making books good. There is no plot and the setting doesn’t matter, Hemmingway does everything around the characters and the characters are all that matters. He portrays these people of the so called “lost generation” very well, perhaps too well. In portraying a boring subject matter, Hemmingway has also made a boring book. I constantly found myself turning to Tolkien’s “Lord of the Rings” to pull myself out of the drudge and boredom that is “The Sun Also Rises.” It’s too bad that such skill was wasted on such a bad book. “The Sun Also Rises” is one of those books that people claimed to have read when they really meant that they bought it. Commenting on “The Sun Also Rises” is only useful to make one to be a snobbish, intellectual bigot. “The Sun Also Rises” has added nothing to my library and I would use it as toilet paper than as reading material again. Skill doesn’t make a book good, there are many musicians who are very skilled, technically, but can’t play a lick of good music, Hemmingway is just like this. His words are crafted well and he does amazing things with them, but he just doesn’t deliver on the end where it matters. “The Sun Also Rises” is best put on a coffee table or in a library and left there to collect dust and be forgotten in the minds of men. The time spent reading this book would have been better spent doing anything else. The characters were boring and if I had my choice they never would have been birthed into the literary world. This book, “The Sun Also Rises” was a waste of trees, because of it I can not breathe quite as well anymore. You could say it took my breathe away, but that is only because it took away the things that changed the air so that I could breath. In short, if you see “The Sun Also Rises” in a book store run quickly. If someone tells you that you should read “The Sun Also Rises” punch them in the face and then kick them in the head. The End

Inflation and investing

After 3 years of basically squandering my money on some pretty useless things I’ve just recently started looking into planning for savings, retirement, kids, and other things that need money and pop up along the way. During my research I’ve found quite a number of people that will project how much money you’ll have when you finally cash out on your investments and enjoy retirement. None of the numbers I’ve seen account for inflation and so none of those numbers show you the actual worth of your money as compared to numbers with which you’re familiar. The purpose of this post is to show why investing is important in a realistic way. I’m not going to say put $10,000 in a decent investment and you’ll be a millionaire by the time you retire! What I am going to say is that the earlier you invest, the earlier you might be able to retire (assuming you plan your date of death properly!). So with out further adieu here’s why you should invest in numbers that you can actually compare to today:
Let’s say you invest in a pretty decent index fund and get an average return of 7% over the entirety of your investment. With a fairly conservative rate if inflation being 3.5% and leaving it in that investment for 40 years, your money would increase like this:

(1.07/1.035)^40 = 3.78

So if you put in $10,000 now it would be as if you had $37,800 when it came time to pull the money out for retirement. The actual number will be higher, but the value of that money as compared to today would be $37,800.
Now if inflation was more like 3% over that time you’d have

$10,000 * (1.07/1.03)^40 = $45,900

Look at what a difference .5% can make over 40 years of investing!
Now I’ll show you why a savings account is not a long-term investment:

$10,000 * (1.01/1.035)^40 = $3760
$10,000 * (1.01/1.03)^40 = $4564

Banks are where you put money for things you need in the “near-term”, I’m thinking that means within 2-3 years.

For anything beyond 3 years, but not much further, you probably want a CD. Today the rates blow, but they usually beat inflation by a little bit. Actually they still beat inflation now, since the average over 2009 was -0.34% and most returns I’ve seen hover around 1-2%.  If inflation stays on for the length of the CD as deflation, then you’d be in good shape with a CD.  However, you might as well leave your money in a high-yield savings account for the time being as the return compared to a CD is pretty similar.

When you want to buy something within a few days the place you keep it is your mattress. I know no one puts their money in their mattress as a long-term investment, but just to illustrate how terrible it is for you to leave your money sitting in your house for 40 years:

$10,000 * (1.00/1.035)^40 = $2526
$10,000 * (1.00/1.03)^40 = $3066

Your $10,000 effectively becomes $3066! That means that the money you could use to buy a 600cc race replica motorcycle today would turn into money that might be able to buy you a 250cc training motorcycle in the future.  You could buy a plush, robust leather couch today, or you could do nothing and wait 40 years to buy a half-way decent futon.  It’s your choice, but a mattress is not an investment account.  It’s a sure way to lose money.  Well you’re not really losing money, you’re losing the value/worth of money which is way more important that than the number

If you ever want to see what the current inflation is I got 2009’s data from Inflationdata.com

Investing $10,000 today won’t make you a millionaire in 40 years, but it will make you 4 to 4.5 times richer than you were.  The longer you wait, the older you’ll need to be when you retire.  The stock market may have seemed like a dangerous place to put your money in 2009 as we’re undergoing a recession, but considering the dollar deflated over the same time period, any return was fantastic!  Inflation puts a damper on the big numbers you’ll see for investing early, but you still get more worth out of your money the longer it has to collect compounding interest.

I guess I should end this article now, but I will say there are places to put your money for every time frame and my next money article will cover those different storage places.